Phil Murrin

Partner

Londres

Phil specialises in errors and omissions and professional indemnity claims, insurance and reinsurance disputes and claims against directors and officers. He has been involved in high-profile, high-value disputes concerning solicitors, surveyors, accountants, brokers, and directors and officers.

Successfully added
Failed to add

About Phil

Bio
  • Biografía

    Phil specialises in errors and omissions and professional indemnity claims, insurance and reinsurance disputes and claims against directors and officers. He has been involved in high-profile, high-value disputes concerning solicitors, surveyors, accountants, brokers, and directors and officers.

    Phil has conducted numerous high profile and important court disputes, including successes in the Court of Appeal in Hibbert Pownall Newton v Whitehead 2008, Nouri v Marvi in 2009 and Lyons v Fox Williams in 2018; the successful multiple claim summary judgment application in Lewis v Ward Hadaway 2015 – the leading case on court fee abuse – and the successful defence of the superyacht transaction dispute in Healey v Shoosmiths 2016. Phil has twice given evidence in High Court trials on clients' behalf (Zurich v Karim 2006 and Equitas v Horace Holman 2007) and has extensive mediation and arbitration experience.

    Phil is recommended in both Legal 500 and Chambers and has been praised in the directories for being “on top of what the market’s up to”, having “an astute immediate and intuitive grasp of the relevant issue in any case” and for being a “decisive and efficient and a lateral thinker who doesn’t get bogged down in the detail.

Sector Expertise
  • Seguros

Service Expertise
  • Resolución de litigios

  • Responsabilidad profesional

  • Reaseguro

Office Location

Londres

  • 25 Walbrook
  • Londres
  • EC4N 8AF

+44 207 242 101122

Articles

There are no matching articles, please try a different filter.

Seguros

6 min read

Professionals and liability for words – more protection for claims in malicious falsehood following landmark Supreme Court judgment

Seguros

6 min read

Supreme Court clarifies the meaning of deliberate concealment for limitation purposes

Seguros

10 min read

Staying on the hook - Court of Appeal finds against Insurer on condonation and aggregation in solicitors Scottish castle fraud case.

Artículo

5 min read

Lawyers' Liabilities Newsletter | December 2023

Artículo

9 min read

The end of the long and winding road? Supreme Court rules on deliberate concealment in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41

Seguros

7 Min Read

Handling monies as stakeholder – the law under review

Seguros

5 Min Read

In With the New: Changes to Legal Ombudsman Schemes Rules from 1 April 2023

Seguros

3 Min Read

Amendments to the Disclosure Pilot Scheme

Seguros

3 min read

Is it a more difficult claims environment for professionals as a result of Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton?

Seguros

3 min read

One step too far - stakeholder solicitors defeat buyer-funded development claim